ok, i can assume this is all 3L30 questions
but can get confusing, here are both pages.
see below for real pages.
the below photo out of last page in 3L30 manual, shows,suzuki and GM run different, torque, it's GM's transmission and flex plate, my guess is suzuki has there own bolts and flex plate? (there is no way to prove that due to GM does not use suzuki P/n,.)
so is 35/47 ft/lbs. why not just go with 47, suzuki wins.... in my book. (gm does in fact have many errors in their books, like this)
it can be very confusing , gm does two things different than SUzuki
one thing is they use only one number for torque, buy a real suzuki FSM and its a low and high. RANGE. after all, no torque wrench is precision.
my joke is GM cant handle that. 2 numbers in their head at same time, LOL
but is correct, all bolts have this RANGE, and there is dry and we bolt spec. onwet is oil threads., in this case its dry
problem 2 is GM uses their one torque's, far different than Suzuki in some cases. and no one on earth knows why. (GM retired people, do?)
keep in mind we are talking, 1989 to 1998 , 10 years, of FSM , no, 10 FSM books times 2, for both gm and suzuki, 20 FSM books to read, and correlated facts. (im not game) lol
we have the suzuki, 3l30 book. online, many places.
let me dig that up.
that 62 sounds like NM metric torque to me.
here is the last page in the trans manual, for 3L30, showing the TC offset "A" gap
the other side, of the flex, i believe is covered in the engine book
![[Image: 3_12_05_16_1_34_34.jpeg]](http://www.fixkick.com/bbs2/Suzuki-bbs/gallery/3_12_05_16_1_34_34.jpeg)
photo 2
![[Image: 3_12_05_16_1_54_27.jpeg]](http://www.fixkick.com/bbs2/Suzuki-bbs/gallery/3_12_05_16_1_54_27.jpeg)
but can get confusing, here are both pages.
see below for real pages.
the below photo out of last page in 3L30 manual, shows,suzuki and GM run different, torque, it's GM's transmission and flex plate, my guess is suzuki has there own bolts and flex plate? (there is no way to prove that due to GM does not use suzuki P/n,.)
so is 35/47 ft/lbs. why not just go with 47, suzuki wins.... in my book. (gm does in fact have many errors in their books, like this)
it can be very confusing , gm does two things different than SUzuki
one thing is they use only one number for torque, buy a real suzuki FSM and its a low and high. RANGE. after all, no torque wrench is precision.
my joke is GM cant handle that. 2 numbers in their head at same time, LOL
but is correct, all bolts have this RANGE, and there is dry and we bolt spec. onwet is oil threads., in this case its dry
problem 2 is GM uses their one torque's, far different than Suzuki in some cases. and no one on earth knows why. (GM retired people, do?)
keep in mind we are talking, 1989 to 1998 , 10 years, of FSM , no, 10 FSM books times 2, for both gm and suzuki, 20 FSM books to read, and correlated facts. (im not game) lol
we have the suzuki, 3l30 book. online, many places.
let me dig that up.
that 62 sounds like NM metric torque to me.
here is the last page in the trans manual, for 3L30, showing the TC offset "A" gap
the other side, of the flex, i believe is covered in the engine book
photo 2
http://www.fixkick.com