04-05-2019, 05:33 AM
that is a 96 bell you have , mine is 95, so
96 has vast changes.
and the 96 drawings is wrong, that cable is wrong, and is shown wrong in the Suzuki and GM sites. (the rubber end mount is used 96 up)not that cable and not that bracking holding that rubber end, but GM also was late with the upgards here, a fact.
only looking matters, on all 96s and knowing many of those parts changed,
in CAMI factory july 1995 is the change over day for SUZ but GM did it later, (months) My guess is to deplete stock , when not related to EPA law.
as my motto says, fixing cars is easy finding good parts, NOT. (or right ones )
the suzuki bush number is
23264-60a00
see here. at SUZ sales.
https://www.suzukicarparts.com/parts/ind...eid=214820
96 has vast changes.
and the 96 drawings is wrong, that cable is wrong, and is shown wrong in the Suzuki and GM sites. (the rubber end mount is used 96 up)not that cable and not that bracking holding that rubber end, but GM also was late with the upgards here, a fact.
only looking matters, on all 96s and knowing many of those parts changed,
in CAMI factory july 1995 is the change over day for SUZ but GM did it later, (months) My guess is to deplete stock , when not related to EPA law.
as my motto says, fixing cars is easy finding good parts, NOT. (or right ones )
the suzuki bush number is
23264-60a00
see here. at SUZ sales.
https://www.suzukicarparts.com/parts/ind...eid=214820
(04-05-2019, 02:38 AM)sina27 Wrote: Hold that thought -
looking at another diagram (96 sidekick JS) on megazip, I see this instead of the other picture:
This diagram does not show the same part 7 and 11, but shows something else for part 7.
Question is - which diagram to trust?
http://www.fixkick.com