the ckp issue (if engine cam 'belt and cogs are perfect) and wires to sensor are perfect (means connectors too)
1: new sensors, 5 or more makers of sensors, and some my like thicker gasket, (who know this, would cost $200 or more to learn this)
2: sand sensor base.(mill the sensor say 1/16" of an inch or 1.5mm ) over 1mm is kinda scary to me, off hand thinking about it.
3: new pan install per 96,97,98,book , not 95 or older. (do not read Chilton or Haynes books of lies , the mix 10 years of information in a book of TOXIC soup, witches brew bad.)
4: the 2 wire to the sensor is shielded. if that is bad, the signal gets weaker and full of noise.
the sensor is here, it is just a coil of wire, and due to that fact is a very weak output, some cars are 0.5v pulse only at idle, and due to this fact (non hall sensors)
they (SUZUKI) put a shield on the cable,to keep that signal strong, so if that is damaged it can fail; easy ,for sure this car.,
![[Image: EFI3.jpg]](http://www.fixkick.com/ECU/1996/EFI3.jpg)
1: new sensors, 5 or more makers of sensors, and some my like thicker gasket, (who know this, would cost $200 or more to learn this)
2: sand sensor base.(mill the sensor say 1/16" of an inch or 1.5mm ) over 1mm is kinda scary to me, off hand thinking about it.
3: new pan install per 96,97,98,book , not 95 or older. (do not read Chilton or Haynes books of lies , the mix 10 years of information in a book of TOXIC soup, witches brew bad.)
4: the 2 wire to the sensor is shielded. if that is bad, the signal gets weaker and full of noise.
the sensor is here, it is just a coil of wire, and due to that fact is a very weak output, some cars are 0.5v pulse only at idle, and due to this fact (non hall sensors)
they (SUZUKI) put a shield on the cable,to keep that signal strong, so if that is damaged it can fail; easy ,for sure this car.,
http://www.fixkick.com