EPA , rule on 21 cars, that just dont work for OBD2 compliance. I think they mean, #6 may fail, and to ignore this.... quote EPA: Saf-C 3222.06 Exemptions from Rejection Criteria. (a) The following vehicles shall not be rejected for inspection due to “readiness” status as set forth in Saf-C 3222.03(d): see below. d) A vehicle subject to the OBD inspection shall be rejected if: (1) The DLC is missing, has been tampered with, is damaged or is otherwise inoperable; (2) The MIL does not illuminate with the ignition key in the “key on, engine off” position; (3) The MIL is illuminated when the engine is running; (4) The MIL is commanded “on” for one or more OBD diagnostic trouble codes; (5) The MIL is commanded to be illuminated and does not visually illuminate; Saf-C 3200 - Page 26 ________________________________ (6) Monitors reveal a “not ready” status in accordance with (e) below; or (7) The vehicle cannot communicate with the scan tool. the list (the dirty 21) (3) All models of 1996 Subaru; (4) All models of 1996-1998 Mitsubishi; (5) Chevrolet Tracker, model years 1996 and 1997; (6) Dodge Viper, model year 2003; (7) Ford Probe GT, model years 1996 and 1997; (8) Hyundai Accent, model years 1996 and 1999; (9) Hyundai Elantra, model years 1996 and 1999; (10) Hyundai Sonata 2.0L engine only, model years 1996-1998; (11) Kia Sephia, model year 1996; (12) Kia Sportage, model year 1996; (13) Mazda Protégé, model year 1996; (14) Plymouth Breeze, model year 2000; (15) Porsche 911, model years 1996 and 1997; (16) Saab 900/9000, model years 1996 and 1997; (17) Suzuki Sidekick, model year 1996; (18) Volvo 850, model years 1996 and 1997; (19) Volvo 850 turbo, model year 1996; (20) Volvo S70, model year 1998; (21) Volvo S90, model year 1998; (22) Volvo V70, model year 1998; and (23) Volkswagen Passat, model year 1996.